Radiometric dating christian perspective roger wiens

The disagreement in values needed to support the position of young-Earth proponents would require differences in age measured by orders of magnitude (e.g., factors of 10,000, 100,000, a million, or more).The differences actually found in the scientific literature are usually close to the margin of error, usually a few percent, not orders of magnitude!

In a related article on geologic ages (Ages), we presented a chart with the various geologic eras and their ages.We scientists who measure isotope ages do not rely entirely on the error estimates and the self-checking features of age diagnostic diagrams to evaluate the accuracy of radiometric ages.Whenever possible we design an age study to take advantage of other ways of checking the reliability of the age measurements.The overall reliability of radiometric dating was addressed in some detail in a recent book by Brent Dalrymple, a premier expert in the field. 80-81]: These methods provide valid age data in most instances, although there is a small percentage of instances in which even these generally reliable methods yield incorrect results.Such failures may be due to laboratory errors (mistakes happen), unrecognized geologic factors (nature sometimes fools us), or misapplication of the techniques (no one is perfect).Their results consistently agree with an old Earth.

389

Leave a Reply